Journals37
Newest
Devious Journal Entry
2 min read
Alright people..
...those of you who read my journals...
-----------------------------------
I don't know how many of you are aware, but when I first joined DA, I was VERY against sexuality. I have grown up. Sex is great, and nice, and I am almost as happy and open about it as Bonobos. In lieu of that, I am going to link you to my NSFW tumblr page. As in. my tumblr blog full of pictures which make me personally horny. It is the smallest of my newest projects, and tends to get my attention only in the rather short time between when I'm interested in looking at pretty pictures, and when im too horny to concentrate on updating my blog, or adding more tags, and have to do something about the new, self inflicted "problem".
Now that i have given you TMI, thepressurebelow.tumblr.com
the "the pressure below" refering of course to the pressure that the whole body, brain included is put under by the groinal regions while horny. just "the pressure below" sounds much nicer than "horny".
------------------------------------
one of the main reasons for me being okay with my sexuality is because i've gone spiritual. Or Esoteric. or enlightened. or started my training to become a Jedi knight. Whatever you want to call it, be aware that i am NOT religious, though I have the capacity to understand those who are.
-------------------------------------
ARTSY STUFF:
currently working on a line of clothing that i intend to wear in every day life. I want to wear clothing I cant afford to have custom made. The clothing is hopefully going to represent my progress towards who I want to be.
with Love,
Claudia
...those of you who read my journals...
-----------------------------------
I don't know how many of you are aware, but when I first joined DA, I was VERY against sexuality. I have grown up. Sex is great, and nice, and I am almost as happy and open about it as Bonobos. In lieu of that, I am going to link you to my NSFW tumblr page. As in. my tumblr blog full of pictures which make me personally horny. It is the smallest of my newest projects, and tends to get my attention only in the rather short time between when I'm interested in looking at pretty pictures, and when im too horny to concentrate on updating my blog, or adding more tags, and have to do something about the new, self inflicted "problem".
Now that i have given you TMI, thepressurebelow.tumblr.com
the "the pressure below" refering of course to the pressure that the whole body, brain included is put under by the groinal regions while horny. just "the pressure below" sounds much nicer than "horny".
------------------------------------
one of the main reasons for me being okay with my sexuality is because i've gone spiritual. Or Esoteric. or enlightened. or started my training to become a Jedi knight. Whatever you want to call it, be aware that i am NOT religious, though I have the capacity to understand those who are.
-------------------------------------
ARTSY STUFF:
currently working on a line of clothing that i intend to wear in every day life. I want to wear clothing I cant afford to have custom made. The clothing is hopefully going to represent my progress towards who I want to be.
with Love,
Claudia
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Functional human being?
1 min read
Hey peoples.
To those of you who haven't given up on me already: I have a ...not so much a problem, but more a riddle. I have been given to realize that I am not a functioning person, and that that is the reason Relationships havent work for me for my life so far. Can any of you explain to me what you would define as a functional human being?
just to make this clear: I AGREE with the assessment of me not being a functional human being, my problem is that I am not sure how to change more than I already have without an idea of what the outcome should look like, so to speak.
any Ideas? thanks C:
and I promise to upload more art and works as soon as I am a functioning human being.
To those of you who haven't given up on me already: I have a ...not so much a problem, but more a riddle. I have been given to realize that I am not a functioning person, and that that is the reason Relationships havent work for me for my life so far. Can any of you explain to me what you would define as a functional human being?
just to make this clear: I AGREE with the assessment of me not being a functional human being, my problem is that I am not sure how to change more than I already have without an idea of what the outcome should look like, so to speak.
any Ideas? thanks C:
and I promise to upload more art and works as soon as I am a functioning human being.
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
A Speach
1 min read
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
See you.
2 min read
I'm off to the english country for the next four months, so will probably not get to a computer or Internet too often, so I'm going to consider myself absent for all purposes. I have finally uploaded some of the photos from Rome and Auschwitz, and added hasty annotations to them, I've been trying to get as much as possible done this evening... I have had a lot of thoughts on the meaning of life coursing through my mind lately and meant to share them here with you, but am currently not up to the job. I apologise for leaving you thus unsatisfied. I hope you enjoyed the few photos I HAVE uploaded, and don't forget me despite me being stressed and uncreative at the moment. If I get to a computer at some point soon I might expand on this journal, but at the moment I just want to get to bed and sleep, yet still need to pack and clear up my room.
On that note I love you and leave you.
And despite not being "around" a lot, I would appreciate it if anybody who felt like it left a comment so I know that I'm still actually cared about. If you like, and say so, I will answer.
bye <3
On that note I love you and leave you.
And despite not being "around" a lot, I would appreciate it if anybody who felt like it left a comment so I know that I'm still actually cared about. If you like, and say so, I will answer.
bye <3
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
A Couple of Thinkers
4 min read
Is the sentence "This is a tautology." a tautology?
www.fanfiction.net/s/5782108/1…
Are things ever illogical? How does one define logics? Is logics a simple cause and effect scenario between two objects which may or may not be new cause or causes for new effects in other objects? Does that not mean that everything, by existing or its absence of existing is following the rules laid down of which attributes an object must have to be logical and so must be logical? What is the case though if in a theoretical situation an object should be effected by no rational cause? That is to say, what if for example a pebble should suddenly stop laying pressure on the plain it lies on, and refrains from having any friction with it either despite not having any cause to let it be under the power of the laws of physics? Is not logics not only cause and effect, but any rules presented by existence? If a pebble should stop being dominated by the laws of physics, does that not automatically by being so cause that to be logical as well. Things do not need to be explained to be logical. A child would find it logical that a stone falls down when released in the air, yet if it falls up sometimes, albeit as often as one to the power of the amount of molecules in this universe, does that not make it logical it should have the possibility of falling up as well? Is not everything, by happening (or lack thereof) logical?
What then about rationality? Rationality could be defined as a name for a style of process of thought which takes the known facts, and follows the causes and effects presented by the objects given in those facts mentally so as to be able to anticipate the outcome of certain inputs from the thinker onto the situations, and choose which input would cause an outcome most resembling the thinkers ultimate goal, or a step leading towards that goal. Can then be things irrational? If this style of process is not undertaken by the thinker, then her unavoidable input (whether through actions or lack thereof) can be called irrational.
The third term on this discourse is "unnatural" much like illogical, this term could be said to applicable to absolutely nothing, because everything existing within this universe is natural, due to natural referring to nature which in turn refers to "the physical world or material world" (Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature). Some people say that nature refers to the "natural" state of the world, in other words: the world before its been tampered with. A debatable point which could lead to the cause of why people would use the word unnatural referring to something that exists. Assuming that this druid.at/cmseasy/uploads/image… is natural, and this blogs.cornell.edu/glp-cmm367/f… is not natural, one could say that everything which takes a step out of the circle of life www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX07j9… and does not make use only of what biological tools (in the case of humans, feet, legs, arms, hands, teeth, etc.) which were "given" the species is unnatural. By that definition then, the Darwin Finch ezinearticles.co m/?Endangered-Species---Darwin-Finch&id=4369665 is unnatural, as are all uses of tools in primates www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/psych… . Admittedly, the example given there is a questionable one, due the fact they are "tame" or primates that have been "tampered with". Therefore another example news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6387611.st… here. Humans use of tools then in not unnatural. Is building homes unnatural? upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia… . What of towns? lh3.ggpht.com/_hNo6WfAN0Fo/SLg… what of the knowledge we gather and store? renovatingtherustbelt.wordpres… Is the only real unnatural thing our form of learning that is based on deductions and not the "traditional" trial and error? I cannot question my own system of deduction, because to do that I would need a higher form of thought so as to be able to question deduction from above, so the system may not retain itself inspite of being completely in error.
And the couple mentioned in the title? Same-sex couple. Obviously.
www.fanfiction.net/s/5782108/1…
Are things ever illogical? How does one define logics? Is logics a simple cause and effect scenario between two objects which may or may not be new cause or causes for new effects in other objects? Does that not mean that everything, by existing or its absence of existing is following the rules laid down of which attributes an object must have to be logical and so must be logical? What is the case though if in a theoretical situation an object should be effected by no rational cause? That is to say, what if for example a pebble should suddenly stop laying pressure on the plain it lies on, and refrains from having any friction with it either despite not having any cause to let it be under the power of the laws of physics? Is not logics not only cause and effect, but any rules presented by existence? If a pebble should stop being dominated by the laws of physics, does that not automatically by being so cause that to be logical as well. Things do not need to be explained to be logical. A child would find it logical that a stone falls down when released in the air, yet if it falls up sometimes, albeit as often as one to the power of the amount of molecules in this universe, does that not make it logical it should have the possibility of falling up as well? Is not everything, by happening (or lack thereof) logical?
What then about rationality? Rationality could be defined as a name for a style of process of thought which takes the known facts, and follows the causes and effects presented by the objects given in those facts mentally so as to be able to anticipate the outcome of certain inputs from the thinker onto the situations, and choose which input would cause an outcome most resembling the thinkers ultimate goal, or a step leading towards that goal. Can then be things irrational? If this style of process is not undertaken by the thinker, then her unavoidable input (whether through actions or lack thereof) can be called irrational.
The third term on this discourse is "unnatural" much like illogical, this term could be said to applicable to absolutely nothing, because everything existing within this universe is natural, due to natural referring to nature which in turn refers to "the physical world or material world" (Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature). Some people say that nature refers to the "natural" state of the world, in other words: the world before its been tampered with. A debatable point which could lead to the cause of why people would use the word unnatural referring to something that exists. Assuming that this druid.at/cmseasy/uploads/image… is natural, and this blogs.cornell.edu/glp-cmm367/f… is not natural, one could say that everything which takes a step out of the circle of life www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX07j9… and does not make use only of what biological tools (in the case of humans, feet, legs, arms, hands, teeth, etc.) which were "given" the species is unnatural. By that definition then, the Darwin Finch ezinearticles.co m/?Endangered-Species---Darwin-Finch&id=4369665 is unnatural, as are all uses of tools in primates www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/psych… . Admittedly, the example given there is a questionable one, due the fact they are "tame" or primates that have been "tampered with". Therefore another example news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6387611.st… here. Humans use of tools then in not unnatural. Is building homes unnatural? upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia… . What of towns? lh3.ggpht.com/_hNo6WfAN0Fo/SLg… what of the knowledge we gather and store? renovatingtherustbelt.wordpres… Is the only real unnatural thing our form of learning that is based on deductions and not the "traditional" trial and error? I cannot question my own system of deduction, because to do that I would need a higher form of thought so as to be able to question deduction from above, so the system may not retain itself inspite of being completely in error.
And the couple mentioned in the title? Same-sex couple. Obviously.
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In